Except in my case after I died, I said fuck it, I don't care about Geralt, he can be imprisoned and die again for all I care. The main difference is that when you are getting your ass kicked, you think "next time I'll save in here, then use this potion and this enhancement and start again, rather than naturally discover the strategy mid battle. The Witcher is a game that punish you for trying to have fun or take risks, putting emphasis in preparation instead of in the moment quick thinking. The opposite of Kingdoms, in which the story is merely a background for you to use your sweet skills. Is so bad that it hurts the story, because the main character is supposed to be a strong flesh out character but doesn't translate into combat. It's the time of combat that had a focus of being elaborate and deep without taking in account fun or natural player progression. From the very being you are with the poorly explained fighting tutorial and you will start getting frustrated right away. On the opposite spectrum The Witcher 2.is a game that seems to goes all out against the player having any semblance of fun,but which the story captivated me from the start. To make it simple, KOA is a game that rewards you for playing. I could talk about the core fighting mechanics but it would make the post huge. The game play however is just plain fun, even annoying mechanics like lockpicking, blacksmithing and armor enhancements are easy to do, never felt like a chore and the rewards are always good.
#TITAN ATTACKS FFXIV FULL#
There's no personality whatsoever and I don't remember the names of any character, my main party was full of forgettable fellas, except from the female assassin. Kingdoms has a below average story, in which I constantly Lost interested in everyone and ran into the main plot often by mistake, while enjoying the optional quest. Every time.Ĭase in point, my latest 2 games.
0 kommentar(er)
